But noo sum up in a fe problem of civilisation in Europe arising out of t first tried to maintain civil order by t. But after a  too mucrouble. ter ty years  a and called in to maintain civil order. But norouble even ts. Noo do? Send a? No, I do not believe t to call back t. Besides t no t are to do? I see Professor Loicle in tlantic Montitled quot;t, quot; says: quot;Call in t; I am afraid to take t and soldier, rouble t and ts and soldiers in Europe  tion and anarcate of Europe o t call back t, and for goodness sake dont call in t call in tizenso live in peace  priest and  soldier.

    In fact I really believe t tion of t problem of civilisation after t o unsuspected asset of civilisation  of civilisation is t of civilisation because  of a neion er t  of t neion is izenso believe t ture of Man is good; to believe in to believe in t tice. But izenseac to love your fat is tice? tizenseac tice means to be true, to be faito be loyal; t try must be self-lessly, absolutely loyal to  try must be selflessly, absolutely loyal to o  t duty in tizens to say finally y of Loyalty, loyalty not only in deed, but loyalty in spirit or as tennyson puts it,

    to reverence the King as he were

    their King,

    to break t.

    t OF thE ChINESE PEOPLE

    A Paper t o al Society of Peking

    LEt me first of all explain to you ernoon to discuss. t of our paper I ;t of t;! do not mean o speak of ter or ceristics of teristics en been described before, but I t sucion or enumeration of teristics of to ure at all of ter or ceristics of t is not possible to generalize. ter of t from t of ter of t from t of talians.

    But  of t by utionally distinctive in temper and sentiment of tinguis express  of our discussion type of y, or, to put it in plainer and ser he real Chinaman.

    No, I am sure, you eresting subject, especially at t moment,   type of y_to disappear and, in o ype of y_t I propose t before type of y, disappears altogetake a good last look at inctive in  from all otype of y woday.